Stock Image.NEW YORK – The New York Attorney General is suing to dissolve the National Rifle Association (NRA), the largest and most influential pro-gun organization in the nation. Attorney General Letitia James announced Thursday that she is charging the organization with illegal conduct because of their diversion of millions of dollars away from the charitable mission of the organization for personal use by senior leadership, awarding contracts to the financial gain of close associates and family, and appearing to dole out lucrative no-show contracts to former employees in order to buy their silence and continued loyalty.The suit specifically charges the NRA as a whole, as well as Executive Vice-President Wayne LaPierre, former Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer (CFO) Wilson “Woody” Phillips, former Chief of Staff and the Executive Director of General Operations Joshua Powell, and Corporate Secretary and General Counsel John Frazer with failing to manage the NRA’s funds and failing to follow numerous state and federal laws, contributing to the loss of more than $64 million in just three years for the NRA.In the complaint, Attorney General James lays out dozens of examples where the four individual defendants failed to fulfill their fiduciary duty to the NRA and used millions upon millions from NRA reserves for personal use, including trips for them and their families to the Bahamas, private jets, expensive meals, and other private travel. In addition to shuttering the NRA’s doors, Attorney General James seeks to recoup millions in lost assets and to stop the four individual defendants from serving on the board of any not-for-profit charitable organization in the state of New York again. “The NRA’s influence has been so powerful that the organization went unchecked for decades while top executives funneled millions into their own pockets,” said Attorney General James. “The NRA is fraught with fraud and abuse, which is why, today, we seek to dissolve the NRA, because no organization is above the law.”Since 1871, the NRA has operated as a New York-registered 501(c)(4) not-for-profit, charitable corporation. Under state law not-for-profit, charitable corporations are required to register and file annual financial reports with the Charities Bureau in the Office of the Attorney General (OAG). The assets are required to be used in a way that serves the interests of NRA membership and that advance the organization’s charitable mission. However, as today’s complaint lays out, the NRA is alleged to have fostered a culture of noncompliance and disregard for internal controls that led to the waste and loss of millions in assets and contributed to the NRA reaching its current deteriorated financial state. The NRA’s internal policies were repeatedly not followed and were even blatantly ignored by senior leaders. Furthermore, the NRA board’s audit committee was negligent in its duty to ensure appropriate, competent, and judicious stewardship of assets by NRA leadership. Specifically, the committee failed to assure standard fiscal controls, failed to respond adequately to whistleblowers, affirmatively took steps to conceal the nature and scope of whistleblower concerns from external auditors, and failed to review potential conflicts of interest for employees.NRA’s Culture of Self-Dealing, Mismanagement, and NegligenceThe lawsuit alleges that the four men instituted a culture of self-dealing, mismanagement, and negligent oversight at the NRA that was illegal, oppressive, and fraudulent. They overrode and evaded internal controls to allow themselves, their families, favored board members, employees, and vendors to benefit through reimbursed expenses, related party transactions, excess compensation, side deals, and waste of charitable assets without regard to the NRA’s best interests.When board members challenged LaPierre and others over their financial governance and leadership of the NRA, LaPierre retaliated and turned the board against those who attempted to challenge the illegal behavior.The complaint lays out numerous other instances in which LaPierre, Phillips, Powell, Frazer, and other executives and board members at the NRA abused their power and illegally diverted or facilitated the diversion of tens of millions of dollars from the NRA. These funds were in addition to millions of dollars the four individual defendants were already receiving in grossly excessive salaries and bonuses that were not in line with the best practices and prudent standards for evaluating and determining compensation.Wayne LaPierre – Executive Vice-PresidentIn his nearly three decades as executive vice-president, Wayne LaPierre ran the day-to-day operations of the NRA and exploited the organization for his and his family’s financial benefit, and the benefit of a close circle of NRA staff, board members, and vendors. Of note, LaPierre:Spent hundreds of thousands of dollars of the NRA’s charitable assets for private plane trips for himself and his family, including extended family when he was not present.Visited the Bahamas by private air charter at least eight times in an approximate three-year period with his family, at a cost of more than $500,000 to the NRA. On many of those trips, LaPierre and his family were gifted the use of a 107-foot yacht owned by an NRA vendor.Traveled to Africa with his wife for all-expense paid safaris, gifted by an NRA vendor.Spent millions on unwarranted travel consultants for decades, including for the booking of luxury black car services — spending more than $3.6 million in the last two years alone.Secured a post-employment contract for himself with the NRA, without board approval, currently valued at more than $17 million.Allotted several millions of dollars annually in NRA funds for private security costs for himself and his family without sufficient oversight on their use.Received more than $1.2 million in expense reimbursements in just a four-year period for expenditures that included gifts for favored friends and vendors; travel expenses for himself and his family; and membership fees at golf clubs, hotels, and other member clubs.Secured lucrative consulting contracts for ex-employees and board members worth millions.The complaint alleges that as executive vice-president, LaPierre handpicked individuals in senior staff positions at the NRA that have shown themselves to be loyal to LaPierre as an individual, rather than to the organization. Time and time again, LaPierre has shown that loyalty, more than competence and responsibility, is integral to his staffing picks, which led him to personally hire Phillips, Powell, and Frazer — some chosen despite failing to meet the necessary skills or experience for their respective roles and responsibilities.Wilson “Woody” Phillips – Former Treasurer and Chief Financial OfficerWoody Phillips — the former treasurer and CFO, who was responsible for managing the books and financial operations of the NRA — engaged in practices that violated NRA policy, lied on financial disclosure forms, and set up a deal worth more than $1 million that benefitted his girlfriend. Just before his retirement in 2018, Phillips obtained a contract for himself worth $1.8 million, purportedly for monthly consulting services to the incoming treasurer, even though the current treasurer knew nothing about this contract and has confirmed that “Woody [Phillips] never consulted for me.” Phillips, having served in the capacity as the chief steward of the organization’s finances, also oversaw the financial practices that allowed millions of dollars in entertainment and travel expenses incurred by NRA executives to be fraudulently billed to the NRA as disbursements by the NRA’s largest vendor: Ackerman McQueen, an Oklahoma-based advertising and public relations firm. Furthermore, the complaint asserts that Phillips consistently eschewed his fiduciary duties time and time again, as evidenced by his failure to seriously respond to whistleblower complaints about alleged fiscal improprieties and his readiness to unilaterally authorize payments and contracts outside of the NRA adopted purchasing and contracting policies and procedures.Joshua Powell – Former Chief of Staff and Executive Director of General OperationsJoshua Powell, the chief of staff to LaPierre, was terminated after just 3.5 years for, among other things, misappropriating NRA funds during his tenure. Powell, who is known as a LaPierre loyalist, received sudden and substantial salary increases almost immediately after starting his position. Within a month, his salary was doubled retroactively to the beginning of his tenure with the NRA to $500,000. After less than a year, Powell’s salary increased to $650,000. A little over two years into the job, Powell’s salary more than tripled from the original $250,000 to $800,000, despite numerous complaints of abusive behavior and evidence of illegal conduct and inappropriate spending. Further, Powell abused the NRA’s policy on housing and relocation reimbursements, pocketing in excess of $100,000 more than NRA rules allowed.Powell’s tenure was marked by nepotism. LaPierre, Phillips, and Powell also signed off on the hiring of fundraising consultant McKenna & Associates outside of the NRA’s contract process and without going through any approval process. The NRA paid the company more than $5 million over the course of five years. For all of 2018, Powell’s wife was hired as a consultant by McKenna & Associates, and her entire $30,000 monthly consulting fee was passed through the NRA. The hiring of Powell’s wife was hidden from the NRA’s general counsel, in an effort to not draw attention to and affirmatively hide the conflict of interest, and her role was not pre-approved by the NRA board, as the organization’s policy requires. Additionally, Powell requested an NRA vendor to add his father to a rotation of paid photographers, resulting in more than $90,000 in compensation for his father, an expense which was completely passed through to the NRA.John Frazer – Corporate Secretary and General CounselJohn Frazer was chosen by LaPierre to serve as general counsel and also served as corporate secretary at the NRA. Between 2014 and 2018, Frazer repeatedly failed to comply with board governance procedures, make necessary changes, or advise others that governance changes needed to be made; failed to ensure that financial transactions were being addressed by NRA officers and directors in accordance with law; failed to enforce compliance with the NRA’s conflict of interest policy; and failed to ensure that the NRA was in compliance with laws and policies governing whistleblowers. Additionally, Frazer repeatedly certified false or misleading annual statements.Ackerman McQueen – NRA’s Public Relations and Advertising FirmA practice decades-old between LaPierre and Ackerman McQueen’s co-founder — that would continue until the two companies severed ties in 2019 — ensured that Ackerman McQueen would pay for a variety of non-contractual, out-of-pocket expenses for LaPierre and other NRA executives and pass those expenses through to the NRA. The NRA leadership regularly used this pass-through arrangement — where expenses would be paid for by the NRA without written approvals, receipts, or supporting business purpose documentation — to conceal private travel and other costs that were largely personal in nature. Ackerman McQueen would aggregate the expenses into a lump sum amount and provide no details on the nature or purpose of the expenses when billing the NRA for them. The invoices only typically included a one-line description that read “out-of-pocket expenses” and included an invoice total amount. The expenses billed to the NRA for out-of-pocket expenses did not comply with IRS requirements, and, as a result, all such expenses should have been included by the NRA in taxable personal income for LaPierre and other recipients.Ackerman McQueen was paid more than $70 million in just 2017 and 2018 for “public relations and advertising” services and for “out-of-pocket expenditures” that really went to entertainment and travel incurred by NRA executives and associates without scrutiny from within the organization, including millions for private planes, luxury hotels, memberships to private clubs, special events, fancy meals, and even personal hair and makeup services for LaPierre’s wife.NRA Audit Committee’s Failure to AuditUnder New York law, the NRA’s audit committee is responsible for overseeing the accounting and financial reporting processes of the organization and the audit of its financial statements, but the culture of noncompliance and disregard for the internal controls is evident within the audit committee. The committee failed to serve as an independent check on LaPierre, his senior staff, and the NRA as a whole, and basically served as a rubber stamp for the organization’s illicit behavior, when it did review finances.For example, the audit committee is charged with reviewing any contract that has the appearance of a conflict of interest, such as a contracts with insiders referred to as related-party transactions, and must not only perform certain considerations, but also document its deliberations. The committee routinely approved related-party transactions after LaPierre or senior staff entered into such agreements. In fact, in 2018, the audit committee approved seven related-party transactions after the fact, including a contract between the NRA’s then incoming president and Ackerman McQueen. At the time this contract was executed, the terms were known to LaPierre and Phillips, but the audit committee had no knowledge of it. Then, again in 2019 and 2020, the audit committee purportedly approved, retroactively, many other existing NRA contracts, some of which dated back 15 years.The audit committee’s chair testified during a deposition with the OAG that he had no knowledge of New York law governing audit committees, whistleblowers, or conflicts of interest, and that he could not recall the last time he had seen the audit committee charter that specifically states the audit committee “overs[ees] the integrity of financial information” at the NRA. In fact, the committee chair testified that, in his view and contrary to the charter, the audit committee had no role in oversight of internal controls and that “there is no internal auditing” within the NRA and there hadn’t been one in the whole 19 years he served on the NRA board.Unsurprisingly, during numerous occasions, the audit committee failed to respond adequately to whistleblowers, failed to appropriately review and approve related-party transactions and conflicts of interest, and failed to adequately oversee external auditors.Extensive Violations of Fundamental Not-for-Profit LawAttorney General James alleges in her complaint that the NRA violated multiple laws, including the laws governing the NRA’s charitable status, false reporting on annual filings with the IRS and with the OAG’s Charities Bureau, improper expense documentation, improper wage reporting, improper income tax withholding, failure to make required excise tax reporting and payments, payments in excess of reasonable compensation to disqualified persons, and waste of NRA assets; in direct violation of New York’s Estates, Powers & Trusts Laws; New York’s Not-for-Profit Corporation Law; the New York Prudent Management of Institutional Funds Act; and New York’s Executive Law. The illegal nature of the four individual defendants’ action also violated multiple rules of the NRA’s bylaws, the NRA’s employee handbook, and the NRA’s policy manual.The failure of the NRA to comply with multiple fiduciary responsibilities and state and federal laws resulted in the NRA seeing substantial losses on its balance sheet: going from a surplus of $27,802,714 in 2015 to a net deficit of $36,276,779 in 2018 — contributing to a total loss of more than $64 million in just three years.Proposed ResolutionAs a result of all the allegations mentioned above, Attorney General James seeks to dissolve the NRA; asks the court to order LaPierre, Phillips, Powell, and Frazer to make full restitution for funds they unlawfully profited and salaries earned while employees; pay penalties; recover illegal and unauthorized payments to the four individuals; remove LaPierre and Frazer from the NRA’s leadership (Phillips and Powell are no longer employed by the NRA); and ensure none of the four individual defendants can ever again serve on the board of a charity in New York.Attorney General James began her inquiry into the NRA in February 2019.The matter was led by Bureau Chief James Sheehan and Bureau Co-Chief of the Enforcement Section Emily Stern, with a team of attorneys, legal assistants, and accountants, including Assistant Attorney General and Special Counsel of the Litigation Bureau Monica Connell; Assistant Attorneys General William Wang, Sharon Sash, Jonathan Conley, Stephen Thompson, and Erica James — all of the Charities Bureau; with additional assistance from Chief Accountant Judith Welsh-Liebross, Associate Accountant Darren Beauchamp, and Associate Accountant Charles Aganu; in addition to numerous other individuals at the OAG. The Charities Bureau is part of the Division for Social Justice, which is supervised by Chief Deputy Attorney General Meghan Faux and First Deputy Attorney General Jennifer Levy. Share:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to email this to a friend (Opens in new window)
By Dialogo February 25, 2013 I think it’s spectacular I love playing very neat hahaha it’s very good conqueror of all worlds, very good hhhmmmmmmmmmmm this game is awesome… WHAT’S THE QUALITY OF THIS GAME it’s cool one can’t play without downloading, and it downloads and it’s not enough, nooo, let us play without downloading Very good and interesting. it seems a good game to play that it’s a very pretty and stupid game because on the first level there’s a way, but not on the second, that’s why how do you play The Brazilian Army has a new weapon to fight the cyber war: the National Simulator for Cyber Operations. This software, known by its Portuguese acronym SIMOC, builds training environments that simulate known virtual threats — as well as threats not yet discovered. Decatron, a private company with 17 years in the information technology market, developed SIMOC for the Center of Cyber War Instruction (CIGE), which was instrumental in its design. The Brazilian Defense Ministry funded the project with a grant of $2.55 million. SIMOC is one of the pillars of Brazil’s National Defense Strategy to build equipment and platforms for cyber defense. “A team of information technology specialists is working exclusively on this project,” said Carlos Rust, director of Rio de Janeiro-based Decatron, which is the Brazilian partner of U.S. computer giant Hewlett Packard. Rust said the software took a year to develop and involved 30 Brazilian professionals. He said a centerpiece of the National Defense Strategy is promoting employment and generating revenues through the defense industry. “This is one of the most important projects developed by the Army’s Communications and Electronic Warface Center,” said General Antonino dos Santos Guerra, commander of the center, also known as CCOMGEX. The SIMOC simulator, he said, “is a solution that promotes national technology and helps to raise Brazil’s GDP.” Preparing for 2014 — and 2016 Rust also emphasized the importance of a national simulator that prepares Brazil for virtual defense as the country readies to host next year’s FIFA World Cup as well as the 2016 Summer Olympics. He told Diálogo that SIMOC’s main advantage is that is very nimble. “It is flexible and allows the creation of practically any scenario of defense or attack,” he said. “These scenarios are created by the instructor and are stored in a knowledge database to be reused. All the practices and actions of attack and defense are also stored for reutilization.” This flexibility is a major plus for SIMOC, given that most comparable software programs on the market include only a pre-defined number of scenarios and don’t allow for customization. But the Brazilian system was built based on international experience, since the Armed Forces are involved in these types of projects “in all countries of the world,” Gen. Dos Santos said. The simulator software helps analyze network vulnerabilities, which lets users act in a controlled environment while adopting an active defense strategy, he said. Training is based on real scenarios of disasters and risks to Brazil’s critical infrastructure. System is adaptable for military and civilian training SIMOC works with usernames and passwords. Once logged in, a user may choose to reproduce an existing computer network or build a new one. The software allows technical reporting of all operations conducted in the virtual environment. The simulator is dual-use, “meaning that the software can be used for military training and for civilian training in big companies,” Rust said. “It also can be used to conduct analysis of network vulnerabilities, not just for training.” The application utilizes virtualization technology running several operating systems from one terminal, and various open-source components to meet certain requirements. While the use of open-source software may raise some eyebrows, Rust does not see it as a security risk. “Some of the functionalities were built utilizing open-source software, which is an advantage because we have control of the code,” he said. “This way we generate a complete product at the same level of the most advanced foreign solutions, with 100 percent control of it.” Brazil determined not to let hackers win With the World Cup coming up in June 2014, at least one group besides the athletes themselves are working hard to make the most of the event: computer hackers. But the Brazilian government has invested $20.4 million to avoid attacks on state-run networks as well as computerized infrastructure systems such as airports. “The possibility that Brazil will suffer a massive attack is the same as that of someone declaring war on the country,” said General José Carlos dos Santos, commander of Brasília’s Center for Cyber Defense (CDCiber), in a recent interview with Correio Braziliense. “It is low, but it exists.” CDCiber is getting ready for all eventualities. Army Colonel Eduardo Wallier Vianna, with the center, warns that a cyber-attack could really wreak havoc on the World Cup. “Let’s suppose that someone invades the database of the World Cup’s ticket system and starts selling duplicate tickets,” he told the newspaper Folha de São Paulo. “Hundreds of people would arrive at the stadium with fake tickets. That would generate confusion, wild crowds and deaths.” To avoid this chaos and the resulting damage to Brazil’s international prestige, CDCiber “identifies the most critical areas, analyzes the information and studies previous cases,” Col. Vianna said. Courses in cyber warfare At SIMOC’s unveiling in the CCOMGEX auditorium, officers demonstrated how they used the software during a CIGE exercise as part of a course on cyber warfare — the first such course ever offered by the Brazilian Armed Forces to Army, Navy and Air Force personnel. Also attending the event was Decatron’s executive manager, Bruno Mello, along with Lieutanant Colonel Márcio Ricardo Fava, of CCOMGEX, and other military officials. In 2012, 24 high-ranking officers at CCOMGEX took a six-month course to operate SIMOC, and are now qualified to face virtual threats such as common are hackers and organized groups that attack sites in order to draw attention to a cause — not to mention criminals, spies and cyber warriors. SIMOC can also be used remotely, which puts it within the reach of other Brazilian military institutions. “It only needs an instructor to go to the other institution to coordinate the activities of the simulator,” dos Santos explained, adding that while the technology is also available to interested educational institutions, “we need to be careful whom we train.”
Winamax maintains Granada CF sponsorship despite bleak Spanish outlook August 19, 2020 StumbleUpon Related Articles Share Martin Lycka – Regulatory high temperatures cancel industry’s ‘silly season’ August 11, 2020 Andrea Vota – Jdigital’s challenge of Spanish restrictions is led by logic and rationale August 13, 2020 Submit Share Spanish gambling insiders expect regulatory body la Dirección General de Ordenación del Juego (DGOJ), to re-open its tender process window for new market applicants for Spain’s regulated online gambling market.At present the DGOJ has made no formal announcement with regards to accepting new tenders, however, this September the regulatory body announced through its website a ‘draft call’ for potential market interest.The new tender process is expected to be re-opened during 2017 and will allow for a one-year window in which operators can submit applications. The DGOJ will seek to respond to interested parties within a six-month time frame.The DGOJ’s previous tender window was published in October 2015, in which the regulatory body allowed for ten new licensed company’s servicing online betting and software/platform provisions.A blog posted by industry legal and licensing experts DLA Piper details that DGOJ governance has moved to ‘open up’ its market having recorded positive sector development during Q1 2017 in which the online gambling sector grew by 23% year-on-year.Of further interest to DGOJ governance, has been the number of international operators detailing interest in re-joining the Spanish online market, following a number of changes with regards to online casino restrictions, allowing for more favourable market conditions.
Donegal Action for Cancer Care has raised a fantastic €2,244 at their recent fundraising raffle.Betty Holmes of the Donegal Action for Cancer Care Committee would like to thank everyone for their continued support.“We do very little fundraising so this money will enable us to continue the hard work we have been doing for over 12 and a half years. We are all voluntary and unpaid for the work we do,” she said. “We have an extensive work record. We continue to work to ensure the people of Donegal have access to world-class cancer services whilst ensuring the retention and development of all cancer services at Letterkenny University Hospital.“We never stop, nor will we,” she added.The numbers were drawn independently by two young men who were watching a football match at the venue; Eoin McLaughlin and Michael Sweeney. The lucky winners on the night were as follows: No 1- €100 Hamper won by Mr Shaun Doherty Newmills sponsored by DACC Members & FriendsNo 2- €75 Hamper won by Mr Peter Quinn Fintown sponsored by DACC Members & FriendsNo 3- Carvery Lunch for two sponsored by The Station House Hotel Letterkenny won by Mr Ben Mc Glynn Brockagh.No 4- Sunday Carvery Lunch for two sponsored by An Grianan Hotel Burt won by Kathleen Mc Dermott GlenkeeraghNo 5- Full Sunday lunch for two sponsored by Coyle’s Bar & Restaurant Newtowncunningham won by Mr John Hamilton RaphoeNo 6- 1 Hours Bowling for 6 people at Arena 7 sponsored by Arena 7 Letterkenny won by Mr Jason Mc Geehan GlenkeeraghNo 7- €20 Voucher & a bottle of Wine sponsored by Kernan’s Tullygay Letterkenny won by Mr Bernard Muldoon KillygordonNo 8- Bottle of Wine & Box Ferrero Rocher sponsored by Silver Tassie Hotel won by Mr Cathal Timoney Newmills.No 9- Bottle of Wine & Box of Biscuits sponsored by a well-wisher won by Mrs Betsy Simcot GlasgowNo 10- Bottle of wine & box of Biscuits sponsored by a well-wisher won by Mrs Emma Golden St Johnston.Donegal Action for Cancer Care raise over €2,200 with Halloween raffle was last modified: November 4th, 2017 by Elaine McCalligShare this:Click to share on Facebook (Opens in new window)Click to share on Twitter (Opens in new window)Click to share on LinkedIn (Opens in new window)Click to share on Reddit (Opens in new window)Click to share on Pocket (Opens in new window)Click to share on Telegram (Opens in new window)Click to share on WhatsApp (Opens in new window)Click to share on Skype (Opens in new window)Click to print (Opens in new window) Tags:Arena 7Betty HolmesDACCDONEGAL ACTION FOR CANCER CAREfundraiser